[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120517183459.9C9B83E0621@localhost>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:34:59 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] GPIO: MIPS: lantiq: convert gpio-mm-lantiq to OF and of_mm_gpio
On Wed, 16 May 2012 22:49:53 +0200, John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org> wrote:
> Implements OF support and convert to of_mm_gpio.
>
> By attaching hardware latches to the External Bus Unit (EBU) on Lantiq SoC, it
> is possible to create output only gpios. This driver configures a special
> memory address, which when written to, outputs 16 bit to the latches.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Ummm...
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
... but there are comments below that should be addressed before
merging.
Also this patch conflates a lot of changes that should be in
separate patches. It's a lot easier to review discrete changes
instead of a bunch of stuff lumped together. It's just a device
driver and the code is better after the patch so I'm not going to make
a big deal about it.
g.
> ---
> This patch is part of a series moving the mips/lantiq target to OF and clkdev
> support. The patch, once Acked, should go upstream via Ralf's MIPS tree.
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c
> index b91c7f1..9296801 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mm-lantiq.c
> @@ -3,16 +3,18 @@
> * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published
> * by the Free Software Foundation.
> *
> - * Copyright (C) 2010 John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
> */
>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> -#include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> -#include <linux/gpio.h>
Why is include/gpio.h being dropped? This file uses that header.
Depending on another include file using it isn't recommended.
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>
> #include <lantiq_soc.h>
>
> @@ -25,102 +27,131 @@
> #define LTQ_EBU_BUSCON 0x1e7ff /* 16 bit access, slowest timing */
> #define LTQ_EBU_WP 0x80000000 /* write protect bit */
>
> -/* we keep a shadow value of the last value written to the ebu */
> -static int ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow = 0x0;
> -static void __iomem *ltq_ebu_gpio_membase;
> +struct ltq_mm {
> + struct of_mm_gpio_chip mmchip;
> + u16 shadow; /* shadow the latches state */
> +};
>
> -static void ltq_ebu_apply(void)
> +/*
> + * ltq_mm_apply - write the shadow value to the ebu address.
nit: Kerneldoc format should be:
/**
* ltq_mm_apply() - write the shadow value to the ebu address.
See Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
> + * @chip: Pointer to our private data structure.
> + *
> + * Write the shadow value to the EBU to set the gpios. We need to set the
> + * global EBU lock to make sure that PCI/MTD dont break.
> + */
> +static void ltq_mm_apply(struct ltq_mm *chip)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ebu_lock, flags);
> ltq_ebu_w32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON, LTQ_EBU_BUSCON1);
> - *((__u16 *)ltq_ebu_gpio_membase) = ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow;
> + *((__u16 *)chip->mmchip.regs) = chip->shadow;
Nasty casting.
> ltq_ebu_w32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON | LTQ_EBU_WP, LTQ_EBU_BUSCON1);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ebu_lock, flags);
> }
>
> -static void ltq_ebu_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
> +/*
> + * ltq_mm_set - gpio_chip->set - set gpios.
> + * @gc: Pointer to gpio_chip device structure.
> + * @gpio: GPIO signal number.
> + * @val: Value to be written to specified signal.
> + *
> + * Set the shadow value and call ltq_mm_apply.
> + */
> +static void ltq_mm_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset, int value)
> {
> + struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
> + struct ltq_mm *chip =
> + container_of(mm_gc, struct ltq_mm, mmchip);
> +
> if (value)
> - ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow |= (1 << offset);
> + chip->shadow |= (1 << offset);
> else
> - ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow &= ~(1 << offset);
> - ltq_ebu_apply();
> + chip->shadow &= ~(1 << offset);
> + ltq_mm_apply(chip);
> }
>
> -static int ltq_ebu_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
> - int value)
> +/*
> + * ltq_mm_dir_out - gpio_chip->dir_out - set gpio direction.
> + * @gc: Pointer to gpio_chip device structure.
> + * @gpio: GPIO signal number.
> + * @val: Value to be written to specified signal.
> + *
> + * Same as ltq_mm_set, always returns 0.
> + */
> +static int ltq_mm_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset, int value)
> {
> - ltq_ebu_set(chip, offset, value);
> + ltq_mm_set(gc, offset, value);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static struct gpio_chip ltq_ebu_chip = {
> - .label = "ltq_ebu",
> - .direction_output = ltq_ebu_direction_output,
> - .set = ltq_ebu_set,
> - .base = 72,
> - .ngpio = 16,
> - .can_sleep = 1,
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> -};
> +/*
> + * ltq_mm_save_regs - Set initial values of GPIO pins
> + * @mm_gc: pointer to memory mapped GPIO chip structure
> + */
> +static void ltq_mm_save_regs(struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc)
> +{
> + struct ltq_mm *chip =
> + container_of(mm_gc, struct ltq_mm, mmchip);
> +
> + /* tell the ebu controller which memory address we will be using */
> + ltq_ebu_w32(CPHYSADDR(chip->mmchip.regs) | 0x1, LTQ_EBU_ADDRSEL1);
>
> -static int ltq_ebu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> + ltq_mm_apply(chip);
> +}
> +
> +static int ltq_mm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - int ret = 0;
> struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + struct ltq_mm *chip;
> + const __be32 *shadow;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (!res) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get memory resource\n");
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> - res = devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, res->start,
> - resource_size(res), dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> - if (!res) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request memory resource\n");
> - return -EBUSY;
> - }
> -
> - ltq_ebu_gpio_membase = devm_ioremap_nocache(&pdev->dev, res->start,
> - resource_size(res));
> - if (!ltq_ebu_gpio_membase) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to ioremap mem region\n");
> + chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!chip)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - }
>
> - /* grab the default shadow value passed form the platform code */
> - ltq_ebu_gpio_shadow = (unsigned int) pdev->dev.platform_data;
> + chip->mmchip.gc.ngpio = 16;
> + chip->mmchip.gc.label = "gpio-mm-ltq";
> + chip->mmchip.gc.direction_output = ltq_mm_dir_out;
> + chip->mmchip.gc.set = ltq_mm_set;
> + chip->mmchip.save_regs = ltq_mm_save_regs;
>
> - /* tell the ebu controller which memory address we will be using */
> - ltq_ebu_w32(pdev->resource->start | 0x1, LTQ_EBU_ADDRSEL1);
> + /* store the shadow value if one was passed by the devicetree */
> + shadow = of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "lantiq,shadow", NULL);
> + if (shadow)
> + chip->shadow = *shadow;
Device tree properties are big-endian. You'll need to use
be32_to_cpu() or of_property_read_u32().
>
> - /* write protect the region */
> - ltq_ebu_w32(LTQ_EBU_BUSCON | LTQ_EBU_WP, LTQ_EBU_BUSCON1);
> -
> - ret = gpiochip_add(<q_ebu_chip);
> - if (!ret)
> - ltq_ebu_apply();
> + ret = of_mm_gpiochip_add(pdev->dev.of_node, &chip->mmchip);
> + if (ret)
> + kfree(chip);
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static struct platform_driver ltq_ebu_driver = {
> - .probe = ltq_ebu_probe,
> +static const struct of_device_id ltq_mm_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "lantiq,gpio-mm" },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ltq_mm_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver ltq_mm_driver = {
> + .probe = ltq_mm_probe,
> .driver = {
> - .name = "ltq_ebu",
> + .name = "gpio-mm-ltq",
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = ltq_mm_match,
> },
> };
>
> -static int __init ltq_ebu_init(void)
> +static int __init ltq_mm_init(void)
> {
> - int ret = platform_driver_register(<q_ebu_driver);
> -
> - if (ret)
> - pr_info("ltq_ebu : Error registering platfom driver!");
> - return ret;
> + return platform_driver_register(<q_mm_driver);
> }
>
> -postcore_initcall(ltq_ebu_init);
> +subsys_initcall(ltq_mm_init);
Why the change of initcall level?
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists