[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB57952.2090802@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:18:58 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, JBottomley@...allels.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] MCA: delete all remaining traces of microchannel
bus support.
On 05/17/2012 09:40 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Hardware with MCA bus is limited to 386 and 486 class machines
> that are now 20+ years old and typically with less than 32MB
> of memory. A quick search on the internet, and you see that
> even the MCA hobbyist/enthusiast community has lost interest
> in the early 2000 era and never really even moved ahead from
> the 2.4 kernels to the 2.6 series.
>
> This deletes anything remaining related to CONFIG_MCA from core
> kernel code and from the x86 architecture. There is no point in
> carrying this any further into the future.
>
> One complication to watch for is inadvertently scooping up
> stuff relating to machine check, since there is overlap in
> the TLA name space (e.g. arch/x86/boot/mca.c).
Enthusiastically
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists