[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120517222407.GB15766@leaf>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:24:07 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, patches@...aro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: Fix code-style issues
involving "else"
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:12:44PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
>
> The Linux kernel coding style says that single-statement blocks should
> omit curly braces unless the other leg of the "if" statement has
> multiple statements, in which case the curly braces should be included.
> This commit fixes RCU's violations of this rule.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> index fc31a2d..cd9ae33 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> @@ -351,8 +351,9 @@ static int rcu_initiate_boost(void)
> rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.boost_tasks =
> rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.gp_tasks;
> invoke_rcu_callbacks();
> - } else
> + } else {
> RCU_TRACE(rcu_initiate_boost_trace());
> + }
> return 1;
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcutorture.c
> index e66b34a..d7c3cb1 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutorture.c
> @@ -407,8 +407,9 @@ rcu_torture_cb(struct rcu_head *p)
> if (++rp->rtort_pipe_count >= RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN) {
> rp->rtort_mbtest = 0;
> rcu_torture_free(rp);
> - } else
> + } else {
> cur_ops->deferred_free(rp);
> + }
> }
>
> static int rcu_no_completed(void)
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 0da7b88..25874a3 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -893,8 +893,9 @@ static void __note_new_gpnum(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct
> if (rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask) {
> rdp->qs_pending = 1;
> rdp->passed_quiesce = 0;
> - } else
> + } else {
> rdp->qs_pending = 0;
> + }
> zero_cpu_stall_ticks(rdp);
> }
> }
> @@ -2115,9 +2116,9 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
> put_online_cpus();
>
> /* No joy, try again later. Or just synchronize_sched(). */
> - if (trycount++ < 10)
> + if (trycount++ < 10) {
> udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
> - else {
> + } else {
> synchronize_sched();
> return;
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> index 2411000..c9b173c 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> @@ -398,8 +398,9 @@ static noinline void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
> rnp->grphi,
> !!rnp->gp_tasks);
> rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(rnp, flags);
> - } else
> + } else {
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> + }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
> /* Unboost if we were boosted. */
> @@ -429,9 +430,9 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
> {
> struct task_struct *t = current;
>
> - if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting != 1)
> + if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting != 1) {
> --t->rcu_read_lock_nesting;
> - else {
> + } else {
> barrier(); /* critical section before exit code. */
> t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = INT_MIN;
> barrier(); /* assign before ->rcu_read_unlock_special load */
> @@ -824,9 +825,9 @@ sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
> int must_wait = 0;
>
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> - if (list_empty(&rnp->blkd_tasks))
> + if (list_empty(&rnp->blkd_tasks)) {
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> - else {
> + } else {
> rnp->exp_tasks = rnp->blkd_tasks.next;
> rcu_initiate_boost(rnp, flags); /* releases rnp->lock */
> must_wait = 1;
> @@ -870,9 +871,9 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
> * expedited grace period for us, just leave.
> */
> while (!mutex_trylock(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex)) {
> - if (trycount++ < 10)
> + if (trycount++ < 10) {
> udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
> - else {
> + } else {
> synchronize_rcu();
> return;
> }
> @@ -2213,8 +2214,9 @@ static void rcu_prepare_for_idle(int cpu)
> if (rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(cpu)) {
> trace_rcu_prep_idle("More callbacks");
> invoke_rcu_core();
> - } else
> + } else {
> trace_rcu_prep_idle("Callbacks drained");
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.7.8
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists