linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] hp100: delete VG/AnyLAN hp100

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 May 2012 15:50:24 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
	Joel Soete <soete.joel@...rlet.be>
Cc:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, JBottomley@...allels.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Joel Soete <soete.joel@...rlet.be>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] hp100: delete VG/AnyLAN hp100

On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 00:28 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> :
> > On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 17:20 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > > [Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivers/net: delete all code/drivers depending on CONFIG_MCA
> > 
> > If we're removing really old and unused stuff,
> > how about the VG/AnyLAN driver too?
> 
> Joel Soete appeared to actively use a PCI one with recent kernels back
> in 2007.

I saw people using TR adapters with Linux as of 2008/9.

That doesn't mean it's common or make it desirable to
keep TR in the current kernel tree though.

Is VG/AnyLAN different?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/