[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzVpx94YyC3N2rJaNYLnwUmgNDvzSJnbq1ByNhETY4q9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:58:26 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Use __kernel_long_t in struct timex
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:55 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
> I would suggest __slong and __ulong then, to keep with the __[su]*
> namespace, or does the extra "s" look too much like crap?
I do think I could live with it. Maybe we can make x32 do
typedef __s64 __slong;
typedef __u64 __ulong;
and at least not make the "we're declaring a 'long' as a 'long long'"?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists