[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOrKq8Ait8wKudRF535J5c=dDTKekmUN_=HOs5BBLtsoGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:39:07 -0700
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] Use __kernel_ulong_t in struct msqid64_ds
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 04:51 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>> This patch and the one before it seems to have another problem: we
>> currently define __BITS_PER_LONG as:
>>
>> #ifdef __x86_64__
>> # define __BITS_PER_LONG 64
>> #else
>> # define __BITS_PER_LONG 32
>> #endif
>>
>
> H.J., do you see any problem *other* than this wretched struct
> msqid64_ds with changing the above from __x86_64__ to
>
> #if defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ILP32__)
>
> ... in the above?
>
> As far as struct msqid64_ds, I think we can fix it simply because x86
> is the only compat-aware architecture which has to deal with it.
>
> (Incidentally, if sh is ever expanded to 64 bits, it will have a problem
> in the bigendian configuration...)
That will be wrong. __BITS_PER_LONG defines # bits of long
as seen by kernel. We don't use it in user space. Remember
x32 uses the identical interface as x86-64. So
#ifdef __x86_64__
# define __BITS_PER_LONG 64
#else
# define __BITS_PER_LONG 32
#endif
struct msqid64_ds {
struct ipc64_perm msg_perm;
__kernel_time_t msg_stime; /* last msgsnd time */
#if __BITS_PER_LONG != 64
unsigned long __unused1;
#endif
__kernel_time_t msg_rtime; /* last msgrcv time */
#if __BITS_PER_LONG != 64
unsigned long __unused2;
#endif
__kernel_time_t msg_ctime; /* last change time */
#if __BITS_PER_LONG != 64
unsigned long __unused3;
#endif
are absolutely correct for x32. You can think
#if __BITS_PER_LONG != 64
as
#ifndef __x86_64__
which is used in glibc.
--
H.J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists