lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxtejaM8ecOw8VYk74OaXfGY7=LO3JSyz3rdHEv2r9goQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 May 2012 20:49:28 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] Use __kernel_ulong_t in struct msqid64_ds

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:39 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@...il.com> wrote:
>
> That will be wrong.   __BITS_PER_LONG defines # bits of long
> as seen by kernel.  We don't use it in user space.

Yes you do. Exactly in that structure that Peter points to. *Exactly*
because that structure uses "long" instead of some fixed size. Which
will be different in user mode than in kernel mode.

And if user mode doesn't use these headers at all, then we should stop
playing the insane games.

                     Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ