[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB5960E.6070205@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 17:21:34 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
CC: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Use __kernel_[u]long_t for x32 user space compatibility
On 05/17/2012 05:19 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 17 May 2012 18:13:26 H.J. Lu wrote:
>> From: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@...il.com>
>>
>> This patch set changes a number of places where the kernel
>> headers are exported to user space and currently use explicit
>> "long" or "unsigned long" to use __kernel_[u]long_t in order to
>> be compatible with the x32 user space ABI. These location are
>> places where x32 uses the x86-64 ABI.
>>
>> It is quite possible that some, or even all, of these locations
>> should really use dedicated types, but in the meantime this gives
>> the correct results which the current headers do not.
>
> tangentially related, but what happened to the x86 asm/ptrace.h
> patch i sent that changed all the registers from unsigned long to
> u64 ? e.g. struct pt_regs { - unsigned long r15; + __u64 r15;
> -mike
Link please?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists