[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1205180950400.3231@ionos>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 09:55:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ning Jiang <ning.n.jiang@...il.com>
cc: rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: add IRQS_PENDING for nested, simple and level handler to early
abort suspend operation
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Ning Jiang wrote:
> During suspend check_wakeup_irqs() will check IRQS_PENDING flag to
> abort a suspend operation, however, this only applies for edge
> triggered irq. Add IRQS_PENDING for nested, simple and level handler
> to mimic the same behaviour as edge irq handler.
>
> Without this optimization, level irq can be handled correctly but there
> is some penalty. It has to go through a full run/suspend power cycle for level
> irq to be detected and handled. With it, we can abort the suspend operation
> earlier and thus shorten the interrupt latency.
>
> I know this is ugly as IRQS_PENDING is intended for edge irq but I don't
> know how to do it in a right way. Please enlighten me if you have better ideas.
First of all, please send patches inlined. Aside of that a similar
patch is queued in tip/irq/core commit d4dc0f90.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists