[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337335233.573.6.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:00:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add persistent event facilities
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 15:34 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> @@ -6319,6 +6332,10 @@ __perf_event_exit_task(struct perf_event *child_event,
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&child_ctx->lock);
> }
>
> + /* do not remove persistent events on task exit */
> + if (child_event->attr.persistent)
> + return;
> +
> perf_remove_from_context(child_event);
>
Huh, the task it dying, why would you let the event stay in the task
context?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists