[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201205181303.28535.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 13:03:28 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
plagnioj@...osoft.com, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
olof@...om.net, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
On Thursday 17 May 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2012 08:06:01 -0700 Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:50:54PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 16 May 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > > > Now that the bulk of at91sam9g20-related nodes are located in at91sam9260.dtsi,
> > > > we have to re-create the path to this ADC node for SoC specific parts.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> > >
> > > Should we apply this patch in arm-soc so that Greg can drop the hunk that
> > > no longer applies?
> >
> > It's not a "no longer applies", it's a "this does not merge". The patch
> > is in my tree, unless you want me to revert it, it's going to stay there
> > until it goes to Linus.
>
> Just apply the patch to the arm-soc tree - then the merge resolution
> becomes "use the arm-soc version". There is no need for Greg to revert
> the other patch.
>
Yes, good point.
I've applied the patch on the at91/dt branch now.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists