| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJd=RBCYghZkaGwXL2633_tELnNRhhgAcJe_9Q-q8xkEwjFJ-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 21:54:12 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: BFS 420: fix ttwu stat
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com> wrote:
> Due to monolithic runqueue used by BFS, the ttwu stat is bogus as we could not
> tell/predict on which CPU a woken task will run after it is activated. And we
> have to delay updating ttwu stat until the stage when task is taken off run
> queue. To achieve that, a field, wakeup_cpu, is added in the task struct, and is
> inited to be invalid CPU number for each new task.
>
> When updating ttwu stat, now it is simply to mark the delayed operation; and
> when taking task off runqueue, the stat is updated.
>
>
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h Fri May 18 20:51:06 2012
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h Fri May 18 20:32:20 2012
> @@ -1255,6 +1255,11 @@ struct task_struct {
> struct list_head run_list;
> u64 last_ran;
> u64 sched_time; /* sched_clock time spent running */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + int wakeup_cpu; //for ttwu stat
> +#endif
> +#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> bool sticky; /* Soft affined flag */
> #endif
> --- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c Mon May 14 20:50:38 2012
> +++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c Fri May 18 20:46:22 2012
> @@ -1145,6 +1145,30 @@ static inline void unstick_task(struct r
> */
> static inline void take_task(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + if (p->wakeup_cpu == -1)
> + goto skip;
> +
> + if (cpu == p->wakeup_cpu) {
> + schedstat_inc(cpu_rq(cpu), ttwu_local);
> + }
> + else if (cpu_online(p->wakeup_cpu)) {
> + struct sched_domain *sd;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + for_each_domain(p->wakeup_cpu, sd) {
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd))) {
> + schedstat_inc(sd, ttwu_wake_remote);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + }
> + p->wakeup_cpu = -1;
> +skip:
> +#endif
> +#endif
> set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
> dequeue_task(p);
> clear_sticky(p);
> @@ -1485,30 +1509,13 @@ static void try_preempt(struct task_stru
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> -static void
> -ttwu_stat(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags)
> +static void ttwu_stat(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
> struct rq *rq = this_rq();
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -
> - if (cpu == this_cpu)
> - schedstat_inc(rq, ttwu_local);
> - else {
> - struct sched_domain *sd;
> -
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
> - if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd))) {
> - schedstat_inc(sd, ttwu_wake_remote);
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - }
> -
> + p->wakeup_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> schedstat_inc(rq, ttwu_count);
> @@ -1717,6 +1724,12 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
> #if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
> if (unlikely(sched_info_on()))
> memset(&p->sched_info, 0, sizeof(p->sched_info));
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + p->wakeup_cpu = -1;
> +#endif
> #endif
>
> p->on_cpu = false;
> --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists