[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120518144217.GC6875@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 16:42:17 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib: Proportions with flexible period
On Thu 17-05-12 23:56:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 17:43 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > +void fprop_fraction_percpu(struct fprop_global *p,
> > + struct fprop_local_percpu *pl,
> > + unsigned long *numerator, unsigned long *denominator)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int seq;
> > + s64 den;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + seq = read_seqcount_begin(&p->sequence);
> > + fprop_reflect_period_percpu(p, pl);
> > + *numerator = percpu_counter_read_positive(&pl->events);
> > + den = percpu_counter_read(&p->events);
> > + if (den <= 0)
> > + den = percpu_counter_sum(&p->events);
> > + *denominator = den;
> > + } while (read_seqcount_retry(&p->sequence, seq));
> > +}
>
>
> why not use percpu_counter_read_positive(&p->events) and ditch
> percpu_counter_sum()? That sum can be terribly expensive..
Yes. I'm actually not sure why I used the _sum here... Thanks for
spotting this.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists