[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120518152456.GQ20215@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 17:24:56 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add persistent event facilities
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 04:37:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > I'm not seeing the relation to VM_SHARED here.
> >
> > Well, in the sense that if mmap fails in the !VM_SHARED case, I can't
> > enable any persistent events except the ones which are enabled and so
> > I need to allocate another set of resources for that second persistent
> > events user.
>
> Right, well, you could actually allow operations on the fd, just not a
> second mapping :-)
>
> Anyway.. I'd push that error back to the user. If they need a second
> set, let them create it.
>
> Do you really need multiple consumers for your MCE stuff? If so, what
> would be the problem of using VM_SHARED?
Nah, for MCE I'm fine with RO buffers, simple :-).
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists