[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1205181036380.21093@router.home>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 10:37:40 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
pjt@...gle.com, bharata.rao@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, aarcange@...hat.com, danms@...ibm.com,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/numa] sched/numa: Introduce sys_numa_{t,m}bind()
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Most of that is due to existing interfaces, I'm afraid we cannot
> simplify without reducing those :/
I think some change to those would also be appropriate. Those have grown
over a long time and there are some areas of problematic integration with
the scheduler, numa policies and cpusets etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists