linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/13] block: Generalized bio pool freeing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120518155538.GA19388@google.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 May 2012 08:55:38 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	koverstreet@...gle.com
Cc:	linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	axboe@...nel.dk, agk@...hat.com, neilb@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] block: Generalized bio pool freeing

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:59:48PM -0400, koverstreet@...gle.com wrote:
> From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
> 
> With the old code, when you allocate a bio from a bio pool you have to
> implement your own destructor that knows how to find the bio pool the
> bio was originally allocated from.
> 
> This adds a new field to struct bio (bi_pool) and changes
> bio_alloc_bioset() to use it. This makes various bio destructors
> unnecessary, so they're then deleted.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>

Please add Cc: to maintainers of each modified subsystem.  Other than
that, nice cleanup even without the later removal of bi_destructor.

 Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/