lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120518160903.GD19388@google.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 May 2012 09:09:03 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	koverstreet@...gle.com
Cc:	linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	axboe@...nel.dk, agk@...hat.com, neilb@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] block: Add bio_clone_kmalloc()

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:59:51PM -0400, koverstreet@...gle.com wrote:
> @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static struct bio *bio_chain_clone(struct bio **old, struct bio **next,
>  	}
>  
>  	while (old_chain && (total < len)) {
> -		tmp = bio_kmalloc(gfpmask, old_chain->bi_max_vecs);
> +		tmp = bio_clone_kmalloc(old_chain, gfpmask);
>  		if (!tmp)
>  			goto err_out;
>  
> @@ -751,13 +751,9 @@ static struct bio *bio_chain_clone(struct bio **old, struct bio **next,
>  			if (!bp)
>  				goto err_out;
>  
> -			__bio_clone(tmp, &bp->bio1);
> -

This effectively swaps the order of bio_split() and __bio_clone().  Is
that safe?  Also, please cc the maintainer.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ