[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120518163018.GI19388@google.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 09:30:18 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: koverstreet@...gle.com
Cc: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, agk@...hat.com, neilb@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] block: Add an explicit bio flag for bios that
own their bvec
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:59:56PM -0400, koverstreet@...gle.com wrote:
> From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
>
> This is for the new bio splitting code. When we split a bio, if the
> split occured on a bvec boundry we reuse the bvec for the new bio. But
> that means bio_free() can't free it, hence the explicit flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
> ---
> fs/bio.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/blk_types.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/bio.c b/fs/bio.c
> index ecc9088..3332800 100644
> --- a/fs/bio.c
> +++ b/fs/bio.c
> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ void bio_free(struct bio *bio, struct bio_set *bs)
> {
> void *p;
>
> - if (bio_has_allocated_vec(bio))
> + if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_HAS_VEC))
> bvec_free_bs(bs, bio->bi_io_vec, BIO_POOL_IDX(bio));
We can remove bio_has_allocated_vec()?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists