lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqAJGemCiAebtYczqvV62J_cyZcZDDtkFZyLHPKZg1xqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 May 2012 09:35:11 -0700
From:	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Urgent: x86-32 and GNU ld 2.22.52.0.1

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:19 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 05/18/2012 09:16 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> Please verify that binutils 2.22.52.0.2 is broken
>> and binutils 2.22.52.0.1 is OK.
>>
>
> I believe Ingo is using 2.22.52.0.1, and it is most definitely not okay.
>
> <mingo> GNU ld version 2.22.52.0.1-5.fc17 20120131
> <mingo> gcc version 4.7.0 20120112 (Red Hat 4.7.0-0.6) (GCC)
>

In that case, both 2.22.52.0.1 and 2.22.52.0.2 are bad.

-- 
H.J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ