[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120518001045.259CA3E062C@localhost>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 18:10:45 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one()
On Sat, 12 May 2012 20:05:02 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:46:46PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Allow drivers to use the modern request and configure idiom together
> > with devres.
>
> > As with plain gpio_request() and gpio_request_one() we can't implement
> > the old school version in terms of _one() as this would force the
> > explicit selection of a direction in gpio_request() which could break
> > systems if we pick the wrong one. Implementing devm_gpio_request_one()
> > in terms of devm_gpio_request() would needlessly complicate things or
> > lead to duplication from the unmanaged version depending on how it's
> > done.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
>
> Any chance we can get this into 3.5? Writing error handling code is
> boring :)
Applied, thanks. I'll push it out this evening.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists