| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 18:10:45 -0600 From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one() On Sat, 12 May 2012 20:05:02 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:46:46PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > Allow drivers to use the modern request and configure idiom together > > with devres. > > > As with plain gpio_request() and gpio_request_one() we can't implement > > the old school version in terms of _one() as this would force the > > explicit selection of a direction in gpio_request() which could break > > systems if we pick the wrong one. Implementing devm_gpio_request_one() > > in terms of devm_gpio_request() would needlessly complicate things or > > lead to duplication from the unmanaged version depending on how it's > > done. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> > > Any chance we can get this into 3.5? Writing error handling code is > boring :) Applied, thanks. I'll push it out this evening. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists