[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120518194417.GA14195@mail.hallyn.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:44:17 +0000
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: Add setns support for the mount namespace
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul@...allels.com):
> On 05/12/2012 12:54 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> > setns support for the mount namespace is a little tricky as an arbitrary
> > decision must be made about what to set fs->root and fs->pwd to, as
> > there is no expectation of a relationship between the two mount
> > namespaces. Therefore I arbitrarily find the root mount point, and
> > follow every mount on top of it to find the top of the mount stack.
> > Then I set fs->root and fs->pwd to that location. The topmost root of
> > the mount stack seems like a reasonable place to be.
> >
> > Bind mount support for the mount namespace inodes has the possibility of
> > creating circular dependencies between mount namespaces. Circular
> > dependencies can result in loops that prevent mount namespaces from
> > every being freed. I avoid creating those circular dependencies by
> > adding a sequence number to the mount namespace and require all bind
> > mounts be of a younger mount namespace into an older mount namespace.
> >
> > Add a helper function proc_ns_inode so it is possible to detect when we
> > are attempting to bind mound a namespace inode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>
> Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
These patches haven't made it into linux-next or Linus' tree. (More
worrisome, is that the several online linux-kernel mail archives I've
checked seem to have most of this thread, but not Eric's original
patch.) What path were they expected to go in by?
thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists