linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/10] Use __kernel_ulong_t in struct msqid64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FB6C862.5060401@zytor.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 May 2012 15:08:34 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] Use __kernel_ulong_t in struct msqid64_ds

On 05/18/2012 02:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> But why do you think it's wrong the way it is? I see the idea of putting
> padding in varying places depending on the endianess as a failed experiment
> and defining a structure that is always the same as the logical conclusion
> from that, even if it's a bit silly to have any padding in it at all.
> 

The *whole point* is to make the structure the same across modes, to
make the compat layer's job easier.

> Being consistent seems more important here than following the intent
> of whoever came up with the concept of the ipc64 data structures
> and was consequently ignored by most people after him.

So you're saying because some architectures introduced a bug, we should
*CONTINUE* to introduce the same bug??  WTF??

> If we really wanted the data structures to be compatible between 32 and
> 64 bit mode, we'd have to use __u64 here but that would mean having to
> change all bits of user code that already rely on the existing x86
> compatible layout.

x86 is doing it right.  Some bigendian architectures blindly copied what
x86 was doing without thinking.  That's a bug on their part, period.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/