linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/tpx6586x)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 19 May 2012 17:53:27 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <mike@...pulab.co.il>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/tpx6586x)

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 08:58:08AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/19/2012 07:25 AM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:16:03AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 05/16/2012 03:14 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> >> drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps6586x_i2c_probe':
> >> tps6586x.c:(.devinit.text+0x144e0): undefined reference to `of_regulator_match'

> > Is this one fixed now ? It's coming from Mark's regulator tree, not the MFD
> > one.

> It still fails in linux-next of 20120518.

Probably because the selection of people mailed is rather random - not
only is this the first I've heard about this nobody who actually works
on the driver was contacted either...  I don't know how the recipient
list was picked but I'd suggest including a look at the git history
might be in order.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)