[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABsxX9J+KVSbxVahg-iVsfeNDEM_H8+MrcBBejjCZFrcNCxwtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 11:39:14 -0700
From: "Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Trace event for capable().
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> writes:
>
> > Add a simple trace event for capable().
> >
> > There's been a lot of discussion around capable(), and there
> > are plenty of tools to help reduce capabilities' usage from
> > userspace. A major gap however is that it's almost impossible
> > to see or verify which bits are requested from either userspace
> > or in the kernel.
> >
> > This patch adds a minimal tracer that will print out which
> > CAPs are requested and whether the request was granted.
>
> A small comment assigned from the other issues.
>
> current->pid for anything going to userspace is broken,
> and in fact current->pid should be killed on of these days.
>
> Which pid namespace is your tracer running in?
init - I currently have no need for namespaces myself at all, and, as I replied
to Serge and Eric already - I'll see if I can fis up the tracer with their
suggestions.
Auke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists