[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FB8B2E6.5010601@onlinehome.de>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 11:01:26 +0200
From: Martin <marogge@...inehome.de>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BFS 420: cleanup in tick handling
On 05/19/2012 09:30 AM, Hillf Danton wrote:
> The cpu on stack is not needed, so remove it.
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c Mon May 14 20:50:38 2012
> +++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c Sat May 19 15:18:24 2012
> @@ -2822,8 +2822,7 @@ void wake_up_idle_cpu(int cpu);
> */
> void scheduler_tick(void)
> {
> - int cpu __maybe_unused = smp_processor_id();
> - struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> + struct rq *rq = this_rq();
>
> sched_clock_tick();
> /* grq lock not grabbed, so only update rq clock */
> --
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hillf, I noticed you posting a few patches to BFS recently. Just wanted
to make you aware that there is a certain erm communication issue
between the kernel maintainers and the author of BFS. Since he is busy
in real life you should contact him directly or cc him. See tail -1
Documentation/scheduler/sched-BFS.txt for email.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists