[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120520131908.GV12015@sortiz-mobl>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 15:19:08 +0200
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: lm3533: fix return type of attribute is_visible
Hi Johan,
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 01:18:04PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:40:41AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Since commit 587a1f1659 ("switch ->is_visible() to returning umode_t")
> > the return type of is_visible is umode_t rather than mode_t.
> >
> > This silences a compiler warning on some architectures where these types
> > are not compatible.
> >
> > Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>
> > ---
>
> Apparently Dan Carpenter sent a fix for this compiler warning the day
> after I submitted mine. Dan's patch, however, only fixed the return type
> and not the type of the mode variable.
>
> Could you consider applying this patch one on top of Dan's (which you
> applied to mfd-next on Monday)?
I applied the following chunk:
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static umode_t lm3533_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
struct device_attribute *dattr = to_dev_attr(attr);
struct lm3533_device_attribute *lattr = to_lm3533_dev_attr(dattr);
enum lm3533_attribute_type type = lattr->type;
- mode_t mode = attr->mode;
+ umode_t mode = attr->mode;
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists