[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120521090844.GA12015@sortiz-mobl>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:08:44 +0200
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Add r_select to lm3533 platform data
Hi Johan,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:45:39AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 03:13:37PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > Hi Johan,
> >
> > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 08:22:45PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > Add resistor-select parameter to the platform data.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Hi Samuel,
> > >
> > > I believe this one needs to go in through mfd as the iio driver
> > > destined for staging-next depends on it.
> > It should go along with the iio driver if there is a build dependency.
> > No doing so will prevent the tree from being bisectable.
>
> The sub-drivers already depend on mfd to build as this is where the
> header file resides.
I haven't looked at it, but if the iio driver Kconfig entry depends on
MFD_LM3533, then I can take this change in as no one will be able to build
your iio driver until the MFD driver is merged.
Is that the case ?
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists