lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120521123246.GB17065@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 May 2012 14:32:46 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	"Shai Fultheim (Shai@...leMP.com)" <Shai@...leMP.com>
Cc:	Vlad Zolotarov <vlad@...lemp.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Move x86_cpu_to_apicid to the __read_mostly
 section


* Shai Fultheim (Shai@...leMP.com) <Shai@...leMP.com> wrote:

> Ingo,
> 
> The reason for this, as you pointed out, is the 'cache line' 
> size (4096 bytes).  We see significant false sharing is we do 
> not move this next to each other.

Which write-often variable caused the many cache flushes/fills? 
cpu_to_apicid is read mostly.

I.e. it might make more sense to identify the frequenty 
*modified* percpu variables, and move them to a separate 
section. I *think* most percpu variables are read mostly, so it 
would be more maintainable in the long run to figure out the 
frequently modified ones, not the frequently not modified ones.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ