[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120521130451.GK2313@8bytes.org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 15:04:51 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] resources: set type of new resource returned by
__request_region()
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 05:18:32PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Previously we returned a new struct resource with only IORESOURCE_BUSY
> set (and possibly IORESOURCE_MUXED or IORESOURCE_EXCLUSIVE), but no
> MEM/IO/etc. bits set. The new resource should inherit the type of
> its parent.
Should it? What about IORESOURCE_WINDOW for example? Any particular
reason for this change to the interface of the __request_region()
function?
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists