[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FBA4448.20509@nod.at>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 15:34:00 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: dedekind1@...il.com
CC: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Heinz.Egger@...utronix.de,
tim.bird@...sony.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] UBI: Export next_sqnum()
On 16.05.2012 15:01, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> I started looking at the code, and made some notes at the same time and
> few minor changes - here is the diff which you can apply on top of your
> patches.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
> index 2399511..2f5c362 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
> @@ -869,15 +869,22 @@ static int attach_by_fastmap(struct ubi_device *ubi)
>
> fm_start = ubi_find_fastmap(ubi);
> if (fm_start< 0)
> + /* TODO: instead, return 1 which means that fall-back to
> + * scanning is needed */
fm_start is the PEB number of the fastmap super block.
It will return 1 if the super block was found at PEB 1.
That's why it returns a negative values in case of an error.
> + /* TODO: Before checking version - check the CRC.
The CRC covers only the fastmap data, not the super block.
> for (i = 0; i< nblocks; i++) {
> + /* TODO: you basically perform the scanning here - you should
> + * share the same code as we use in scan.c: use process_peb().
> + */
What exactly do you mean by that?
process_eb() will not help much because the fastmap data is written
"raw" to the flash. (Without any interaction from the WL sub-system)
I'll release v6 now and address all other issues in v7.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists