linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] irqdomain: Simple NUMA awareness.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 May 2012 13:46:18 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] irqdomain: Simple NUMA awareness.

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:41:35PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sat, 19 May 2012 15:11:44 +0900, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
> > +static inline int irq_domain_nid(struct device_node *of_node)
> > +{
> > +	return of_node ? of_node_to_nid(of_node) : numa_node_id();
> > +}
> > +
> 
> I think this logic should just be rolled into of_node_to_nid()
> directly instead of an irq_domain-specific helper.  PowerPC and Sparc
> are the only architectures doing anything special with of_node_to_nid
> at the moment.  I don't think anyone has bothered to define an
> arch-independent binding for NUMA associations.
> 
> Otherwise this patch looks good to me.
> 
Ok, that sounds fine to me. I've done that in the updated patch. We do
need to include linux/topology.h for the numa_node_id() definition, but
that seems to not cause too much trouble. Cross builds for sparc and
powerpc OF + NUMA platforms seem to hold up at least.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/