lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzag=LfduvHSmE34nEVYOk=MRhUMzK854+icLwthmz5Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 May 2012 10:37:23 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT] Sparc

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:03 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> There is going to be a merge conflict between the commit in the
> net-next tree that adds the Sparc BPF JIT, and the one in here which
> adds arch/sparc/Kbuild.  It should be quite easy to resolve.

Ok, so that had a very obvious resolution, and a "cleaner, but scarier" version.

I picked the cleaner but scarier one - the one that should make the
BFP JIT be built when you do "make arch/sparc" by putting the net
thing into the new arch/sparc/Kbuild file.

I did minimal testing with "make ARCH=sparc" without actually
*building* anything, and in the process also fixed the fact that you
should not select HAVE_BPF_JIT unless networking is enabled (crappy
interface - maybe that "if NET" part really should be in the
HAVE_BPF_JIT rules, not in all the architectures?)

But I do not have (nor do I really want) a sparc cross-compile
environment, so maybe my "cleaner" resolution is just garbage. Can you
please check the end result?

So if I broke something, please call me names and tell me to not try
to think too much, and worry my little brain with things I don't
understand.

The thing is pushed out, so you can see what I did.

                    Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ