[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FBA8829.3010800@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 14:23:37 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: cl@...ux.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
aarcange@...hat.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
hughd@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, adobriyan@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] hugetlb: fix resv_map leak in error path
On 5/18/2012 2:46 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> When called for anonymous (non-shared) mappings,
> hugetlb_reserve_pages() does a resv_map_alloc(). It depends on
> code in hugetlbfs's vm_ops->close() to release that allocation.
>
> However, in the mmap() failure path, we do a plain unmap_region()
> without the remove_vma() which actually calls vm_ops->close().
>
> This is a decent fix. This leak could get reintroduced if
> new code (say, after hugetlb_reserve_pages() in
> hugetlbfs_file_mmap()) decides to return an error. But, I think
> it would have to unroll the reservation anyway.
>
> This hasn't been extensively tested. Pretty much compile and
> boot tested along with Christoph's test case.
>
> Comments?
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
I don't think this is cleaner fix. but I also think we should fix the leak
asap. so Let's simple fix first.
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists