[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120521184352.GA14463@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 21:44:28 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: optimize ISR lookups
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:37:27PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> We perform ISR lookups twice: during interrupt
> injection and on EOI. Typical workloads only have
> a single bit set there. So we can avoid ISR scans by
> 1. counting bits as we set/clear them in ISR
> 2. if count is 1, caching the vector number
> 3. if count != 1, invalidating the cache
>
> The real purpose of this is enabling PV EOI
> which needs to quickly validate the vector.
> But non PV guests also benefit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
BTW host to guest netperf result (which is 100% CPU bound)
seems to increase pretty drastically:
before
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 11.0.0.104
(11.0.0.104) port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send Utilization Service
Demand
Socket Socket Message Elapsed Send Recv Send
Recv
Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote local
remote
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/s % S % S us/KB
us/KB
87380 16384 16384 10.01 7905.79 11.26 99.50 2.801 1.031
after
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 11.0.0.104
(11.0.0.104) port 0 AF_INET
Recv Send Send Utilization Service
Demand
Socket Socket Message Elapsed Send Recv Send
Recv
Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote local
remote
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/s % S % S us/KB
us/KB
87380 16384 16384 10.01 8826.59 11.36 99.20 2.531 0.921
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 93c1574..232950a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,16 @@ static inline void apic_clear_vector(int vec, void *bitmap)
> clear_bit(VEC_POS(vec), (bitmap) + REG_POS(vec));
> }
>
> +static inline int __apic_test_and_set_vector(int vec, void *bitmap)
> +{
> + return __test_and_set_bit(VEC_POS(vec), (bitmap) + REG_POS(vec));
> +}
> +
> +static inline int __apic_test_and_clear_vector(int vec, void *bitmap)
> +{
> + return __test_and_clear_bit(VEC_POS(vec), (bitmap) + REG_POS(vec));
> +}
> +
> static inline int apic_hw_enabled(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
> {
> return (apic)->vcpu->arch.apic_base & MSR_IA32_APICBASE_ENABLE;
> @@ -210,6 +220,16 @@ static int find_highest_vector(void *bitmap)
> return fls(word[word_offset << 2]) - 1 + (word_offset << 5);
> }
>
> +static u8 count_vectors(void *bitmap)
> +{
> + u32 *word = bitmap;
> + int word_offset;
> + u8 count = 0;
> + for (word_offset = 0; word_offset < MAX_APIC_VECTOR >> 5; ++word_offset)
> + count += hweight32(word[word_offset << 2]);
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> static inline int apic_test_and_set_irr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic)
> {
> apic->irr_pending = true;
> @@ -242,6 +262,25 @@ static inline void apic_clear_irr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic)
> apic->irr_pending = true;
> }
>
> +static inline void apic_set_isr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic)
> +{
> + if (!__apic_test_and_set_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR))
> + ++apic->isr_count;
> + ASSERT(apic->isr_count > MAX_APIC_VECTOR);
> + if (likely(apic->isr_count == 1))
> + apic->isr_cache = vec;
> + else
> + apic->isr_cache = -1;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void apic_clear_isr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic)
> +{
> + if (__apic_test_and_clear_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR))
> + --apic->isr_count;
> + ASSERT(apic->isr_count < 0);
> + apic->isr_cache = -1;
> +}
> +
> int kvm_lapic_find_highest_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> @@ -273,6 +312,10 @@ int kvm_apic_set_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq)
> static inline int apic_find_highest_isr(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
> {
> int result;
> + if (!apic->isr_count)
> + return -1;
> + if (likely(apic->isr_cache != -1))
> + return apic->isr_cache;
>
> result = find_highest_vector(apic->regs + APIC_ISR);
> ASSERT(result == -1 || result >= 16);
> @@ -492,7 +535,7 @@ static void apic_set_eoi(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
> if (vector == -1)
> return;
>
> - apic_clear_vector(vector, apic->regs + APIC_ISR);
> + apic_clear_isr(vector, apic);
> apic_update_ppr(apic);
>
> if (!(apic_get_reg(apic, APIC_SPIV) & APIC_SPIV_DIRECTED_EOI) &&
> @@ -1081,6 +1124,8 @@ void kvm_lapic_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> apic_set_reg(apic, APIC_TMR + 0x10 * i, 0);
> }
> apic->irr_pending = false;
> + apic->isr_count = 0;
> + apic->isr_cache = -1;
> update_divide_count(apic);
> atomic_set(&apic->lapic_timer.pending, 0);
> if (kvm_vcpu_is_bsp(vcpu))
> @@ -1248,7 +1293,7 @@ int kvm_get_apic_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (vector == -1)
> return -1;
>
> - apic_set_vector(vector, apic->regs + APIC_ISR);
> + apic_set_isr(vector, apic);
> apic_update_ppr(apic);
> apic_clear_irr(vector, apic);
> return vector;
> @@ -1267,6 +1312,8 @@ void kvm_apic_post_state_restore(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> update_divide_count(apic);
> start_apic_timer(apic);
> apic->irr_pending = true;
> + apic->isr_count = count_vectors(apic->regs + APIC_ISR);
> + apic->isr_cache = -1;
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> index 6f4ce25..9f8deff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ struct kvm_lapic {
> u32 divide_count;
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> bool irr_pending;
> + s16 isr_count;
> + int isr_cache;
> void *regs;
> gpa_t vapic_addr;
> struct page *vapic_page;
> --
> MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists