[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FBAACAC.3080300@am.sony.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 13:59:24 -0700
From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
To: Venkat Subbiah <vsubbiah@...iumnetworks.com>
CC: "Rowand, Frank" <Frank_Rowand@...yusa.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 2/2] fix printk flush of messages
On 05/21/12 13:10, Venkat Subbiah wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 06:09 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> Updates console-make-rt-friendly.patch
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL, printk() output is never flushed by
>> printk() because:
> So this is an issue for printk() itself and is not just for early_printk()?
>
>
> # some liberties taken in this pseudo-code to make it easier to follow
> printk()
> vprintk()
> raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock)
> # increment preempt_count():
> preempt_disable()
> result = console_trylock_for_printk()
>
> As I read it console_trylock_for_printk() is called from printk() but in
> code it is called from vprintk()
Yes, I goofed on the indentation, starting at console_trylock_for_printk().
It should have been:
# some liberties taken in this pseudo-code to make it easier to follow
printk()
vprintk()
raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock)
# increment preempt_count():
preempt_disable()
result = console_trylock_for_printk()
retval = 0
# lock will always be false, because preempt_count() will be >= 1
lock = ... && !preempt_count()
if (lock)
retval = 1
return retval
# result will always be false since lock will always be false
if (result)
console_unlock()
# this is where the printk() output would be flushed
Thanks,
Frank
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists