[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120521222449.GJ17031@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 01:24:49 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: optimize ISR lookups
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:14:18AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:04:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > @@ -242,6 +262,25 @@ static inline void apic_clear_irr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic)
> > > > apic->irr_pending = true;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static inline void apic_set_isr(int vec, struct kvm_lapic *apic)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (!__apic_test_and_set_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR))
> > > > + ++apic->isr_count;
> > > > + ASSERT(apic->isr_count > MAX_APIC_VECTOR);
> > >
> > > I'm really curious what you observed when defining DEBUG in that file.
> > >
> > > Clearly you never did.
> >
> > Sorry :(
> > Yes clearly silly, thanks for pointing this out.
>
> That's all you have a reply for? That's the least of the problems ....
Others are not my fault :)
Seriously, if Avi/Marcelo want to rewrite the ISR emulation
I can help. If they want to keep it 1:1 with hardware
then what I wrote seems the only way.
So waiting for them to respond.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists