[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FBB1839.6000606@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 22:38:17 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: acme@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu,
paulus@...ba.org, cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] perf, tool: Fix endianity trick for adds_features
bitmask
On 5/16/12 12:59 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Addons bitmask is stored as array of unsigned long values. The size
> of the unsigned long is same as pointer size for architecture, so it
> could differ for each architecture.
>
> To handle the endianity for adds_features bitmask, we first swap the
> bitmaks as u64 values and check for HEADER_HOSTNAME bit. If not set we
> want to unswap the u64 values and swap the adds_features as u32 values.
>
> This is currently buggy, since we swap just first 32bits of each u64
> value. Adding swap of the next 32 bits as well. Also adding& using
> BITS_TO_U64 instead of BITS_TO_LONGS as counter max due to the different
> size of unsigned longs per architecture.
>
> Note, running following to test perf endianity handling:
> test 1)
> - origin system:
> # perf record -a -- sleep 10 (any perf record will do)
> # perf report> report.origin
> # perf archive perf.data
>
> - copy the perf.data, report.origin and perf.data.tar.bz2
> to a target system and run:
> # tar xjvf perf.data.tar.bz2 -C ~/.debug
> # perf report> report.target
> # diff -u report.origin report.target
>
> - the diff should produce no output
> (besides some white space stuff and possibly different
> date/TZ output)
>
> test 2)
> - origin system:
> # perf record -ag -fo /tmp/perf.data -- sleep 1
> - mount origin system root to the target system on /mnt/origin
> - target system:
> # perf script --symfs /mnt/origin -I -i /mnt/origin/tmp/perf.data \
> --kallsyms /mnt/origin/proc/kallsyms
> - complete perf.data header is displayed
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa<jolsa@...hat.com>
32-bit ppc reading 64-bit x86 still does not work:
# ========
# captured on: Sun May 20 19:23:23 2012
# ========
#
Why not? It suggests there is still a bug in the processing of the
adds_feature bitmap.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists