[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120522053110.GT10209@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 08:31:10 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: fix async page fault working for readonly mapping
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 04:30:41PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 04:15:50PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > On 05/21/2012 04:08 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 02:45:45PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > >> If we map a readonly memory space from host to guest and the page is
> > >> not currently mapped in the host, we will get a fault-pfn and async
> > >> is not allowed, then the vm will crash
> > >>
> > > Why would we want to map a readonly memory space from host to guest?
> > > We may want to do it to support memory semantics on read and mmio on
> > > write, but do not right now unless something changed while I was not
> > > looking.
> >
> >
> > Some test cases in kvm-unit-tests and the benchmark i am writing for KVM
> > need map the function on host to guest.
>
> Or ROM. Or read-only mappings of IVSHMEM (which don't exist yet).
True. KVM should ignore writes to such areas, not kill a guest. Is this
how the code works today?
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists