[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120522060133.GB10829@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 11:31:33 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, peterz@...radead.org, anton@...hat.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, oleg@...hat.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
jkenisto@...ibm.com, andi@...stfloor.org, hch@...radead.org,
ananth@...ibm.com, vda.linux@...glemail.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, acme@...radead.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, roland@...k.frob.com, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/uprobes] uprobes, mm, x86: Add the ability to
install and remove uprobes breakpoints
>
> That said, I think that's true of uprobes too. Why the f*ck would
> uprobes do it's "munmap" operation when we walk the page tables? This
> function was called by more than just the actual unmapping, it was
> called by stuff that wants to zap the pages but leave the mapping
> around.
>
This was pointed out by Oleg earlier and I had moved the code to
unlink_file_vma.
However by the time unlink_file_vma() is called, the pages would
have been unmapped (in unmap_vmas()) and the task->rss_stat counts
accounted (in zap_pte_range()).
If the exiting process has probepoints, uprobe_munmap() checks if the
breakpoint instruction was around before decrementing the probe count.
This check results in a file backed page being re-read by
uprobe_munmap() and also it cannot find the breakpoint (because we read
a file backed page).
i.e
1. The task->rss_stat counts gets incremented again because we have read
a page.
2. mm->uprobes_state.count which should have decremented, doesnt get
decremented as uprobe_munmap fails to see the breakpoint.
Hence I had to move back the callback to zap pages so that we do the
cleanup before the task->rss_stat counts are accounted.
That said, Oleg has a in-works patch/idea for removing uprobe_munmap and
mm->uprobes_state.count, which when done, will remove the
uprobe_munmap hook. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/16/594
Please do let me know if you have better ideas to handle this.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists