[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FBB3B41.8010102@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 16:07:45 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Chunsang Jeong <chunsang.jeong@...aro.org>,
Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>,
Subash Patel <subashrp@...il.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] mm: vmalloc: add VM_DMA flag to indicate areas
used by dma-mapping framework
On 05/17/2012 07:54 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Add new type of vm_area intented to be used for consisten mappings
> created by dma-mapping framework.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
> ---
> include/linux/vmalloc.h | 1 +
> mm/vmalloc.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
> index 6071e91..8a9555a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct; /* vma defining user mapping in mm_types.h */
> #define VM_USERMAP 0x00000008 /* suitable for remap_vmalloc_range */
> #define VM_VPAGES 0x00000010 /* buffer for pages was vmalloc'ed */
> #define VM_UNLIST 0x00000020 /* vm_struct is not listed in vmlist */
> +#define VM_DMA 0x00000040 /* used by dma-mapping framework */
> /* bits [20..32] reserved for arch specific ioremap internals */
>
> /*
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 8cb7f22..9c13bab 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2582,6 +2582,9 @@ static int s_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
> if (v->flags & VM_IOREMAP)
> seq_printf(m, " ioremap");
>
> + if (v->flags & VM_DMA)
> + seq_printf(m, " dma");
> +
Hmm, VM_DMA would become generic flag?
AFAIU, maybe VM_DMA would be used only on ARM arch.
Of course, it isn't performance sensitive part but there in no reason to check it, either
in other architecture except ARM.
I suggest following as
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
#define VM_DMA 0x00000040
#else
#define VM_DMA 0x0
#end
Maybe it could remove check code at compile time.
> if (v->flags & VM_ALLOC)
> seq_printf(m, " vmalloc");
>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists