[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FBB6028.3020307@parallels.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 13:45:12 +0400
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab+slob: dup name string
On 05/22/2012 07:22 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
>> - if (setup_cpu_cache(cachep, gfp)) {
>> > + /* Can't do strdup while kmalloc is not up */
>> > + if (g_cpucache_up> EARLY)
>> > + cachep->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > + else
>> > + cachep->name = name;
>> > +
>> > + if (!cachep->name || setup_cpu_cache(cachep, gfp)) {
>> > __kmem_cache_destroy(cachep);
>> > cachep = NULL;
>> > goto oops;
> This doesn't work if you kmem_cache_destroy() a cache that was created
> when g_cpucache_cpu<= EARLY, the kfree() will explode. That never
> happens for any existing cache created in kmem_cache_init(), but this
> would introduce the first roadblock in doing so. So you'll need some
> magic to determine whether the cache was allocated statically and suppress
> the kfree() in such a case.
David,
I tried to do something like I was doing for the memcg caches: after
creation of the kmalloc + cache_cache, I loop through them and duplicate
the name. So instead of conditionally freeing the late caches - that
could cause consistency headaches in the future - kfree'ing the name
string will just work for all of them. I will send it shortly.
Cristoph, I am dropping your ack since this change is quite significant.
If you agree with it, would you ack it again?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists