[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120522102839.12440.14555.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 14:28:55 +0400
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To: bfields@...ldses.org
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...nvz.org
Subject: [PATCH] NFSd: simplify locking in nfsd_recall_delegations()
Holding of client_mutex looks redundant here - holding of recall_lock looks
enough.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index f004e61..fdef9fc 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -4744,11 +4744,9 @@ void nfsd_recall_delegations(u64 num)
{
unsigned int count;
- nfs4_lock_state();
spin_lock(&recall_lock);
count = nfsd_process_n_delegations(num, nfsd_break_one_deleg, NULL);
spin_unlock(&recall_lock);
- nfs4_unlock_state();
printk(KERN_INFO "NFSD: Recalled %d delegations", count);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists