linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kvm: optimize ISR lookups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FBB6E8B.8020200@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 May 2012 13:46:35 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: optimize ISR lookups

On 05/22/2012 02:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > 
> > Others are not my fault :)
> > 
> > Seriously, if Avi/Marcelo want to rewrite the ISR emulation
>
> Interesting POV, really.
>
> Did you ever notice that the kernel is a collaborative effort and not
> controlled by "Avi/Marcelo"?
>
> Did you ever notice that arch/x86/kvm is part of arch/x86? 

This is silly.  Most of the time the kernel is advanced by incremental
patches.  Sometimes it is advanced by minor or major refactoring.  It is
never advanced by personal attacks on contributors.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/