[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120522120851.GI8730@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 15:08:52 +0300
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
CC: "Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@...com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Clock register in early init
> We had at-least that on the older Samsung parts and they where still
> growing. I would suggest that in a multi-kernel image situation the
> more data that can be discarded after init-time the better.
>
> Also, __initdata gets gathered into one place so there's no possibility
> of page fragmentation there. If you mean fragmentation of the memory
> map, then allocate the size of all the clocks you know of at init time
> in one go.
>
That would work, except that clocks are needed before kmalloc is available.
Cheers,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists