[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120522173922.GC1442@moon>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 21:39:22 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, agordeev@...hat.com,
yinghai@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x2apic, cluster: use all the members of one cluster
specified in the smp_affinity mask for the interrupt desintation
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:21:15AM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 09:04 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > > If the HW implements round-robin interrupt delivery, this
> > > enables multiple cpu's (which are part of the user specified
> > > interrupt smp_affinity mask and belong to the same x2apic
> > > cluster) to service the interrupt.
> >
> > Could/should we do something similar for regular APICs as well?
> > They too support masks and LowestPrio delivery - and doing that
> > will increase test coverage rather significantly.
>
> Existing logical flat xapic mode already takes advantage of this today.
Suresh, should not we tune up es7000_cpu_mask_to_apicid code to return
apicid with a cluster number and ORed logical apicid part as done for
x2apic, or the way it resturns apicid now was done by a purpose?
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists