[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120522134558.49255899.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 13:45:58 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: cl@...ux.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
aarcange@...hat.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
hughd@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, adobriyan@...il.com,
mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: fix resv_map leak in error path
On Mon, 21 May 2012 13:28:14 -0700
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> When called for anonymous (non-shared) mappings,
> hugetlb_reserve_pages() does a resv_map_alloc(). It depends on
> code in hugetlbfs's vm_ops->close() to release that allocation.
>
> However, in the mmap() failure path, we do a plain unmap_region()
> without the remove_vma() which actually calls vm_ops->close().
>
> This is a decent fix. This leak could get reintroduced if
> new code (say, after hugetlb_reserve_pages() in
> hugetlbfs_file_mmap()) decides to return an error. But, I think
> it would have to unroll the reservation anyway.
How far back does this bug go? The patch applies to 3.4 but gets
rejects in 3.3 and earlier.
> This hasn't been extensively tested. Pretty much compile and
> boot tested along with Christoph's test case:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=133728900729735
That isn't my favoritest ever changelog text :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists