[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1205211942540.29814@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 19:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > > > Trying David's patch just posted doesn't fix it.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hmm, what does CONFIG_DEBUG_VM say?
> >
> > No set.
>
> Sorry, should have read "Not set"
>
I mean if it's set, what does it emit to the kernel log with my patch
applied?
I made CONFIG_DEBUG_VM catch !node_online(node) about six months ago, so I
was thinking it would have caught this if either you or Stephen enable it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists