[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1205221529340.18325@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 15:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab+slob: dup name string
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > I think that's precisely David's point: that we might want to destroy them
> > eventually.
>
> Cannot imagine why.
>
We can't predict how slab will be extended in the future and this affects
anything created before g_cpucache_cpu <= EARLY. This would introduce the
first problem with destroying such caches and is unnecessary if a
workaround exists.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists