[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKew6eVXhg9RscZFM1_go3bjvvn_99zqaDRQ1ZjG_BUWCYR0YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 09:47:28 +0530
From: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar01@...il.com>
To: jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] regulator: Add support for MAX77686.
Hi,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:20 AM, <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com> wrote:
> Hi, again.
> On 2012년 05월 22일 14:57, yadi.brar01@...il.com wrote:
>
>
>> +static __devinit int max77686_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < pdata->num_regulators; i++) {
>> + config.dev = max77686->dev;
>> + config.init_data = pdata->regulators[i].init_data;
>> + config.driver_data = max77686;
>> + config.regmap = iodev->regmap;
>> +
>> + rdev[i] = regulator_register(®ulators[i], &config);
>
>
> I'm sorry that i missed one. You have to register all regulators
> unconditionally. Mark brown commented about this to my former patch.
>
> 'No, you should unconditionally register all regulators the device
> physically has. This is useful for debug and simplifies the code.'
> - from Mark Brown
>
Yes, we are registering all regulators here.
As pdata->num_regulators will be equal to ARRAY_SIZE(regulators)
Thanks,
Yadwinder.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists