[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1337748897.14538.184.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 12:54:57 +0800
From: Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kunx.jiang@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: fix the rcu race between free_fib_info and
ip_route_output_slow
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 06:37 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 23:23 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
> > Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:02:03 +0800
> >
> > > 1) Why does free_fib_info call call_rcu instead of releasing fi directly?
> > > I assume other cpu might be accessing it. nexthop_nh->nh_dev is in fi.
> > > If other cpu are accessing it, here resetting to NULL would cause other
> > > cpu panic.
> >
> > Because fib trie lookups are done with RCU locking, therefore we must
> > use RCU freeing to release the object.
> >
> > What I was trying to impart to you is that removing the NULL
> > assignment is wrong and that an alternative fix is warranted (hint:
> > consider moving something into the RCU release).
> > --
>
> Its more than that I'm afraid.
>
> fi->fib_dev (aka fib_nh[0].nh_dev) need full RCU protection.
The new patch posted at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/22/558 does move the
resetting to RCU protection.
>
> Also the "fib_info_cnt--;" must stay in free_fib_info() (so that it is
> protected by RTNL)
We would move "fib_info_cnt--;" back to free_fib_info.
Thanks,
Yanmin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists